Monday 2 March 2015

Coal Gate Scam, an actual loss or a potential loss???



In 1972, the US President Richard Nixon sent burglars in the office of the rival party situated at Watergate to get some classified information. To his dismay, the operation got busted and ultimately the President had to resign from his post. He is the only President in the history of United States of America to have resigned from the post of President. But a legacy was created simultaneously in the name of the scam which due to its scalability gets a place in the scams worldwide to have such a big impact. The suffix “gate” is used hitherto for all scams of such scale. The Coalgate scam, 2G scam are the scams which were awarded the title of “gate scams” due to their large scalability. The coal gate scam, one of the largest so far exemplifies the capabilities of wrongly drafted legislations to cause losses of such a huge scale to the economy of a country. The estimated loss of 1.86 lac cr is sufficient enough to meet the basic demands of many small countries around the world. But whether the loss estimated by CAG and shown by the media was really a loss to the exchequer or was just another attempt to create a sensation and unrest in the world’s largest democracy. In 1973, the Coal mines act gave responsibility to the States over their respective coal mines. In 1992, a screening committee was formed which involved the coal minister and the seven member states accountable for captive coal auctioning.
Well, the news aired in 2012 which said that the decision of government to give coal blocks to private and public companies without the auction caused a loss of 1.86 lac cr rupees. Nowhere in the news was it mentioned that it was a potential loss which was to occur over a period of 100 years. Another claim made by the news reports referring the CAG report and accusing the government was to have given the companies an advantage of “windfall gains”. Though the then PM and the coal minister rebutted the claims stating that the profits made by the companies were anyhow taxable.
The assumption based on which the loss was estimated is also a point of debate as the coal mines that were auctioned, are in the remote places, are the hardest ones to extract coal from which makes the cost of production pretty high and reduces the estimated loss to a pretty much less scale.
Though the idea of giving coal mines without auction was not right and makes the screening committee responsible for the scam, but the whole exercise has put up a question on the role of today’s generation of media in explaining the facts related to a news. Is it their deliberate tendency to create a sensation among the masses and their willing preference towards it rather than creating a true awareness or is it just a mere chance that they missed out these facts of the very CAG report they held as their reference.

#imadethisup:D:D:D